Super Lawyers
Justia Lawyer Rating
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
AVVO
AVVO
The American Board Of Certification:
Martindale-Hubbell

By Lane V. Erickson, Attorney

Estate planning is as unique as the individuals who seek to have it completed. What I mean by this statement is that there is no single estate plan that will work for every individual. Rather, and estate plan should be as unique as the individual for whom it is created. This allows that individual to take into consideration their own personal circumstances, the circumstances of their loved ones, and the changes that may occur in the future that could impact their lives. For this reason, completing a consultation for your estate planning could be vital. Here are the 3 main reasons to complete a free estate planning consultation.

1. ITS FREE

By Joseph G. Ballstaedt

At 4:35 p.m. on February 9, 2017, President Trump tweeted: “SEE YOU IN COURT, THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!” This unsurprising tweet responded to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and its decision not to stay a temporary restraining order (TRO) issued by a federal district court. The TRO halted President Trump’s executive order, which bans immigration from several predominantly Muslim countries. The issues in this legal battle, Washington v. Trump, will surely attract future headlines as they travel through the judicial system.

The Ninth Circuit’s decision was based on several important holdings:

Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:

By Matthew P. Stucki

There are numerous reasons that an individual, known as a Grantor, may decide to use a living trust as the vehicle to transfer his or her property upon death. In most living trusts, the Grantor directs the Trustee to settle with the Grantor’s creditors before distributing the property in the living trust to the beneficiaries. In several states, dealing with creditors of a trust upon the death of a Grantor, is a streamlined process wherein the Trustee provides notice to the creditors through publication or by written statement. Once notice has been provide, the creditor has a limited amount of time to file a claim against the living trust or forever be barred from making a claim. Once barred, the Trustee is free to distribute the trust property to the beneficiaries without the fear of creditors making a claim. In the end, this process protects the Trustee.

Unfortunately, Idaho does not have similar statutes. In an effort to bring about certainty, some practitioners will file a probate when the Grantor of a living trust dies in hopes of taking advantage of the creditor notice statutes under probate law. Once notice is properly provided, creditors are barred from making a claim against the estate. Some would argue that this also bars creditors from coming after trust property as well. Other practitioners will seek an order from a Judge attempting to bar creditors from collecting against a trust after notice is properly given under the probate laws. Still others will advise that it is the best course of action for the Trustee to perform his or her due diligence and discovery all the creditors so that they can properly be dealt with one at a time.

By Matthew P. Stucki

On of the main responsibilities of the personal representative of an estate is to deal with the decedent’s creditors. The first step to start identifying who the decedent’s creditors are would be to examine the decedent’s mail and personal documents. The next step would be to call the major utility companies, including gas, power, trash, and cable to see if the decedent has any open accounts. Lastly, an examination of the decedent’s bank accounts may give some indication of the names of different creditors. In today’s world, it is becoming increasingly difficult to determine creditors as a growing population is conducting their business on the computer. However, these three steps often lead the personal representative to the decedent’s creditors.

Once creditors are identified, there are two ways, according to Idaho Code, to give notice to creditors of the requirement to present their claims against the estate. The first method is by a series of publications in the newspaper that should take place immediately upon getting named as personal representative. After four months, all unknown creditors are forever barred from bringing a claim against the estate if notice is properly published. The second method is by giving actual written notice to known creditors. Upon written notice, the creditor has 60 days from the date of written notice or 4 months from publication in the newspaper, whatever is later, to file a claim.

By Joseph G. Ballstaedt

Idaho law defines punitive damages as “damages . . . over and above what will compensate the [suing party] for actual personal injury and property damage.” They are extra damages that serve the public policies of punishing a wrongdoer and deterring future, similar behavior. For example, if a trespasser enters your property and cuts down a tree worth $100, you could seek compensation for property damages in the amount of $100. In addition to these compensatory damages, you could also obtain punitive damages by showing by clear and convincing evidence that the trespasser’s behavior was “oppressive, fraudulent, malicious or outrageous.”

A claim for punitive damages is not alleged like other claims; it cannot be included in the original complaint. A party can only seek punitive damages at trial if, after filing the original complaint, it receives permission from the judge, in advance of trial, to amend the complaint to include a claim seeking punitive damages. The judge only grants this request if she concludes that there is a reasonable likelihood of proving oppressive, fraudulent, malicious, or outrageous conduct at trial. When making this determination, the opposing party will surely remind the judge that Idaho law disfavors punitive damages and that they “should be awarded in only the most unusual and compelling circumstances.” In sum, there are procedural and policy obstacles to even getting a claim for punitive damages before a jury.

By Joseph G. Ballstaedt

When deciding whether to sue a person or entity, you must be aware that the person or entity may not be able to pay a judgment awarded by a court or may be able to avoid paying the judgment, even if it has the means to pay. A resounding victory in court is utterly worthless if the opposing party is “judgment proof” because it has no assets, little equity in a home or other real property, minimal personal property, no job or source of income, etc. Similarly, even if a party has enough assets to satisfy the judgment, it can hide the assets. Also, a party can file for bankruptcy and be discharged from many of its debts, including most types of civil judgments, leaving a party to fight in bankruptcy proceedings for recovery. Many parties use the threat of bankruptcy as leverage to attain a favorable settlement agreement outside of court.

However, although parties who go bankrupt t are ones that will likely have difficulty finding funds to repay debts, bankruptcy does not legally free a party from all debts and civil judgments. Federal law explains that a bankruptcy does not discharge certain debts, including but not limited to debts for:

By Joseph G. Ballstaedt

Adoption became a recognized legal practice in the United States back in 1851, when Massachusetts passed the Adoption of Children Act, which recognized adoption as a legal means to improve child welfare. Recent studies estimate that about 135,000 children are adopted in America every year, with about 900 of those adoptions occurring in Idaho. The process to adoption in Idaho is explained in Idaho’s own Adoption of Children Act. A major goal of this Act is to provide stable and permanent homes for adoptive children in a prompt manner.

Under the Idaho Adoption of Children Act, any adult can adopt a minor under the process explained in the Act, and an adult can adopt another adult where the adopting adult acted as the parent for a period of a year prior to the adoptee becoming an adult or for a period a court determines establishes “a substantial family relationship.”

By Joseph G. Ballstaedt

Two Republican Senators from Arkansas and Georgia, Tom Cotton and David Perdue, have sponsored new legislation that would limit legal immigration. It is reported that this legislation—the Reforming American Immigration for Strong Employment Act or RAISE Act—would cut by more than half the number of refugees permitted to enter the United States and that it would end a federal green card lottery program. This lottery program is seen as a method of increasing diversity in the visa system by giving visas to countries with lower rates of immigration to the United States.

Senator Cotton has justified the proposed legislation, explaining: “The goal here is to get our immigration levels back to historical norms, to take something of a pause to allow the economy to catch up with the immigrants that we have allowed into our country over the last two generations, and to focus on the well-being of American citizens, those citizens who are here today, many of whom are struggling economically.”

Posted in:
Published on:
Updated:

By Lane V. Erickson, Attorney

As an attorney my job is to apply my expertise, knowledge and experience to help individuals in Idaho solve their Estate Planning and probate problems. Often, when I meet with individuals, they have a series of questions that are specific to their circumstances. I really enjoy when clients come in with specific questions because then I feel like I can help them solve their actual problems and concerns. One question I am often asked by my more affluent clients is that when they own property in different state how does probate work?

1. ORIGINAL PROBATE FILED WHERE PERSON RESIDED

By Lane V. Erickson, Attorney

As an employer you have faced this situation many times. You completed the job application. You narrowed down and interviewed your top choices. All of your hard work paid off and you found the right person for the job. You are excited to hire this person and have them begin working for your business. But wait a minute. You have 4 or 5 other applicants who are not going to get the job.  Now you have to let them know they didn’t get the job. The truth about being an employer is that how you treat those individuals who are being rejected for a job matters. Every situation is an opportunity to build goodwill and a positive business image, including sending out rejection letters.

Sometimes rejection letters are known as a “no thanks letter.” When a rejection letter is viewed as an opportunity, it can end in a positive result for everyone. For instance, when an employer believes that the candidate would qualify for other roles in their company the employer could let the person know that they should apply for a different position. Alternatively, the employer could encourage the applicant to apply again in the future. When a rejection letter is positive, it can maintain a good relationship.

Contact Information